Skip to main content

Focus

Bucharest vs Budapest and Prague: which city wins?

Bucharest vs Budapest and Prague: which city wins?

By Raluca Ogaru

  • Articles

Bucharest is increasingly being compared with other Central and Eastern European capitals, especially when it comes to cost of living, public transport, economic opportunities, and overall urban quality of life. Data published by the international comparison platform Versus.com highlights notable differences between Bucharest, Budapest, and Prague — two cities often seen as regional benchmarks for tourism, infrastructure, and living standards.

The analysis includes demographic, economic, and urban indicators, ranging from rent prices and taxation to public transport costs, population density, and access to cultural activities. The results do not point to a single absolute winner, but rather reveal the strengths of each city.

Overall score: how the capitals rank in international comparisons

Versus.com calculates an overall score based on dozens of indicators grouped into categories such as demographics, cost of living, transportation, environment, leisure, and general urban data.

According to the comparisons analyzed:

  • Bucharest – 84 points
  • Budapest – 89 points
  • Prague – 88 points

The higher scores achieved by Budapest and Prague are mainly influenced by more mature urban infrastructure, a larger number of cultural attractions, and stronger user ratings regarding mobility and public space quality.

However, the differences are not dramatic. The close scores show that Bucharest remains regionally competitive, especially when affordability and economic dynamics are taken into account.

An interesting detail is that Bucharest even outperforms some Western European capitals in certain comparisons. For example, in the Bucharest vs Vienna analysis, Romania’s capital scores 84 points, compared to 78 points for Vienna, largely due to lower living costs and more affordable transportation.

Cost of living: a clear advantage for Bucharest

One of Bucharest’s strongest advantages is its significantly lower cost of living compared to Budapest and Prague. The biggest differences appear in rent and public transportation — two of the most important expenses for residents and expatriates.

According to Versus.com data:

  • average rent for a one-bedroom apartment is about $596 in Bucharest, compared with $664 in Budapest and over $1,150 in Prague;
  • a monthly public transport pass costs around $17.59 in Bucharest, cheaper than Budapest ($24.54) and Prague ($23.73);
  • a single transport ticket averages $0.66, roughly half the price found in the other two capitals.

Additionally, Romania’s standard VAT rate is 19%, lower than Hungary’s 27%, while the maximum income tax rate is also lower than in several neighboring countries.

These factors make Bucharest increasingly attractive for young professionals, international students, and remote workers looking for lower costs in a European capital.

Demographics and urban scale

Bucharest is the largest city among the three in terms of urban population, with approximately 1.83 million inhabitants, more than 500,000 above Prague.

However, this size comes with significantly higher population density:

  • Bucharest: about 8,026 people/km²
  • Budapest: about 3,336 people/km²
  • Prague: about 2,500 people/km²

The higher density helps explain the common perception of congestion in Romania’s capital, but also reflects stronger economic and social activity.

Another important indicator is population age. Bucharest has a younger average population compared to Prague, suggesting stronger attraction for students and active workforce segments.

Transport and urban mobility

Based on user reviews, Budapest and Prague receive higher ratings for public transportation and walkability.

Budapest, for example, scores around 9.3 for public transport, compared with 7.9 for Bucharest, while pedestrian infrastructure is also rated more favorably.

These differences largely result from earlier urban planning development and sustained investment in mobility infrastructure over decades. Nevertheless, Bucharest remains competitive thanks to lower transport costs and the ongoing expansion of its public transport network, including the metro system.

Culture, tourism and leisure

Budapest and Prague clearly lead in cultural heritage and tourism infrastructure.

Data shows that:

  • Budapest has around 120 museums, compared with 56 in Bucharest;
  • Budapest features more UNESCO World Heritage landmarks;
  • Prague benefits from a strong international reputation built around historic architecture and tourism.

At the same time, Bucharest has been gradually narrowing the gap through the growth of cultural events, urban festivals, and the creative industries, becoming increasingly attractive for city-break tourism and active urban lifestyles.

Economy and opportunities

Prague surpasses Bucharest in terms of average salaries, where the gap remains significant. The estimated average income in the Czech capital is more than $600 higher than in Bucharest.

Budapest, meanwhile, records a higher GDP (PPP), reflecting Hungary’s consolidated economic position within the region.

However, Bucharest reports a lower unemployment rate than Budapest, an important indicator of labor market dynamism.

So, who actually wins?

The comparison between the three capitals shows that each city excels in different areas:

Bucharest leads in:

  • affordability and cost of living;
  • lower rents;
  • cheaper public transportation;
  • younger population;
  • lower taxation.

Budapest and Prague lead in:

  • urban and pedestrian infrastructure;
  • cultural heritage and tourism;
  • higher average salaries;
  • perceived overall quality of life.

The conclusion suggested by Versus.com data is that Bucharest stands out primarily through economic accessibility. For people seeking opportunities at lower costs in a large European capital, the city offers clear advantages. Meanwhile, Budapest and Prague remain benchmarks for mature infrastructure and well-established urban experiences.

Ultimately, the “winner” depends less on statistics and more on personal priorities: affordability and urban dynamism, or long-established infrastructure and cultural prestige.

WE ALSO RECOMMEND YOU: 

How Much It Costs to Be a Student in Bucharest in 2026: Rent, Transport, Pocket Money, monthly buget

Bucharest vs. Cluj-Napoca vs. Timișoara: where can you live better on the same salary

Future events