Few rulers in the history of Moldova left a mark as powerful and bloody as Alexandru Lăpușneanu. His name is tied to one of the most horrifying scenes of terror in Romanian medieval history—the massacre of 47 boyars—a moment that turned a simple “reconciliation” banquet into an unprecedented bloodbath. History remembers him not only as a cruel ruler but also as a man obsessed with control and punishing betrayal.

A ruler born from betrayal and vengeance

Lăpușneanu was born in a time when Moldova was torn by internal conflicts, foreign influence, and the ambitions of powerful noble families. 

Descended from the dynasty of Stephen the Great, Alexandru inherited not only royal blood but also a determination to assert unchallenged authority. In 1552, supported by the Polish king Sigismund II Augustus, he ascended the throne of Moldova for the first time, ousting ruler Ioan Joldea.

To strengthen his position, Lăpușneanu married Ruxandra, the daughter of Petru Rareș, himself the illegitimate son of the great Stephen the Great. Through this alliance, he secured both symbolic and political ties with Moldova’s most respected family. 

Yet, the times were far from peaceful: Moldova was caught between Poland’s influence, the Ottoman threat, and Habsburg pressures, while the local boyars constantly shifted loyalties.

To maintain his throne, Lăpușneanu declared loyalty to Poland—a decision that earned him the wrath of the German Emperor Ferdinand and fueled new conspiracies within the court. Soon, he was dethroned and forced into exile, beginning a period of struggles to reclaim power.

The bloody return to the Moldovan throne

After years of humiliation, battles, and diplomatic maneuvers, in 1564 Alexandru Lăpușneanu returned triumphantly to the throne, this time with Ottoman support. 

He secured the sultan’s help in exchange for an immense sum, 200,000 gold ducats, a staggering price even by contemporary standards. Returning to Moldova, he was a changed man: suspicious, relentless, and consumed by the idea of betrayal.

Although he regained the crown, the boyars who had betrayed him previously continued their plots, supporting various pretenders. 

In Lăpușneanu’s mind, a terrible plan began to form. He decided to permanently eliminate the threat posed by the Moldovan nobility, arranging a “peace banquet” at his court in Iași under the pretext of reconciliation. There, he invited the 47 most influential boyars in Moldova.

What seemed to be a peaceful gathering would become one of the bloodiest scenes in Romanian medieval history.

The massacre of the 47 boyars

Once the boyars were seated at the table, the atmosphere appeared calm, and the ruler was seemingly jovial and welcoming. Behind each guest, however, Lăpușneanu had strategically positioned trusted mercenaries. 

Chronicler Grigore Ureche, in The Chronicles of the Land of Moldova, describes the moment in chilling detail: “As soon as the boyars were seated, the lord gave the signal, and the soldiers drew their swords and cut them down mercilessly.”

The boyars had no chance to defend themselves. Screams, the clang of swords, and the metallic scent of blood filled the hall within minutes. The youngest among them tried to resist with platters, chairs, and even cutlery, but their efforts were futile. Within moments, the floor was drenched in the blood of all 47 victims.

Costache Negruzzi, in his famous novella Alexandru Lăpușneanu, immortalized the episode as a literary scene of absolute horror. He depicts the ruler seated alongside Vornicul Moțoc, observing the carnage with cold satisfaction. 

Moțoc, trembling with fear, tried to smile, but the blood flowing around him paralyzed him with terror. “Fools, yet many,” Lăpușneanu reportedly muttered, a chilling reminder of his ruthless authority.

This scene, preserved in chronicles and literature, became a symbol of unbridled cruelty and power.

The reign of fear and terror

Following the court massacre, Lăpușneanu ruled with an iron fist. The remaining boyars swore loyalty, but behind the palace walls reigned silence and suspicion. Everyone knew that a single wrong move could be fatal.

Chroniclers note that the ruler grew increasingly distrustful, making brutal decisions without consulting anyone. At the same time, he sought to strengthen the state: he reorganized the army, fortified the citadels, and imposed strict control over resources. Yet all these achievements were overshadowed by his unrestrained cruelty.

Alexandru Lăpușneanu’s figure remains deeply contradictory: a determined and visionary leader, yet a tyrant who drowned his country in blood.

His final years and death

Towards the end of his life, the ruler was struck by a severe illness—likely a serious eye condition such as glaucoma or trachoma—that affected both his vision and general health. Weak and aware of his approaching death, Lăpușneanu requested to be tonsured as a monk, receiving the name Pahomie.

But fate had one last macabre twist. After his monastic initiation, Lăpușneanu temporarily regained his strength and, in a threatening tone, is said to have declared: “If I rise, many shall pay dearly.” 

This statement terrified the remaining boyars. Fearing his potential return to power, they took the drastic decision to poison him, thus ending his life in 1568.

Alexandru Lăpușneanu was buried at Slatina Monastery, alongside his wife Ruxandra and their two daughters. His death did not bring peace to Moldova, but it ended one of the most turbulent periods in the country’s history.

The legacy of a feared ruler

Today, Alexandru Lăpușneanu’s figure remains one of the most complex and controversial in Romanian history. To some, he is a bloodthirsty tyrant, a symbol of absolute power. To others, he is a determined leader who defended Moldova at any cost, even if that cost was human blood.

In Romanian culture, his image was immortalized through Costache Negruzzi’s novella, which transformed the story of the ruler into a meditation on power, betrayal, and morality. Lăpușneanu’s phrase: “If I rise, many shall pay dearly” or “Fools, yet many” have become emblematic, representing both his authoritarian spirit and cold sarcasm.

Although his past is stained with blood, his name lives on in the modern urban space. In Bucharest, a street bears his name, reminding the city’s residents of one of Moldova’s most feared rulers. It is a paradox of history: a ruler who inspired fear and terror now lends his name to a street in a city that symbolizes modernity and freedom.

A lesson from history and the symbol of absolute power

The massacre at Lăpușneanu’s court remains, in collective memory, a warning of the dangers of unchecked authority. Chroniclers and later writers viewed it as a symbol of medieval violence, but also as a reflection of the fragile trust between rulers and the nobility.

His reign demonstrated that concentrated power could become a weapon of destruction. At the same time, it highlighted a harsh reality: a ruler had to be both leader and warrior, judge and enforcer.

The legacy of Alexandru Lăpușneanu cannot be reduced solely to cruelty. Beneath the bloody actions was a genuine desire for stability in a Moldova torn by internal struggles. Yet the methods he employed—terror and executions—ensured that his name would remain synonymous with fear and merciless authority.

Today, walking along the street that bears his name, one is reminded not only of the bloodshed but also of the lessons of history: absolute power, no matter how legitimate at first, inevitably leads to destruction. Alexandru Lăpușneanu, the ruler of Moldova who killed his entire court of boyars, remains a figure who reminds us of how thin the line is between glory and terror, leadership and tyranny.

We also recommend: